Customer Testimonials
Undoubtedly efficient and very responsive Editorial Staff.
Author's Comments
 
 
Our Journals
  Insight Biochemistry
  Insight Bioinformatics
  Insight Biomedical Science
  Insight Biotechnology
  Insight Cancer Research
  Insight Cardiology
  Insight Diabetes
  Insight Geoscience
  Insight Immunology
  Insight Materials
  Insight Medicine
  Insight Microbiology
  Insight Nanotechnology
  Insight Neuroscience
  Insight Pathology
  Insight Rheumatology
  Insight Surgery
   
 
 
Help Center
Peer Review Policy

Insight Knowledge journals maintain the highest standards of peer review while increasing the efficiency of the process.

All research articles published in a Insight Knowledge journal undergo full peer review, key characteristics of which are listed below:

  • All research articles are reviewed by at least two suitably qualified experts.
  • All publication decisions are made by the journalsí Editors-in-Chief on the basis of the reviews provided
  • Members of the international Editorial Boards lend insight, advice and guidance to the Editors-in-Chief generally and to assist decision making on specific submissions
  • Managing Editors and Editorial Assistants provide the administrative support that allows Insight Knowledge journals to maintain the integrity of peer review while delivering rapid turnaround and maximum efficiency to authors, reviewers and editors alike.
  • Insight Knowledge journals additionally benefit through the manuscript referral process from the high quality peer review conducted by established journals.

Peer review of referred papers:
Editors of Insight Knowledge journals will decide promptly whether to accept, reject, or request revisions of referred papers based on the reviews and editorial insight of the supporting journals. In addition, Editors will have the option of seeking additional reviews when needed. Authors will be advised when Editors decide further review is needed.

Peer review of novel submissions:
Articles submitted directly to Insight Knowledge journal will be fully peer reviewed by at least two appropriately qualified experts in the field selected by the Editor-in-Chief. The Editor-in-Chief or a designated member of the Editorial Board will then decide whether to accept, reject or request revisions based on the reviews and comments received.

Editors will decide whether each submission reports well-conducted research with conclusions supported by the data presented in the paper. Assessments of priority will not be a factor in decision-making, but all papers must make an incremental or novel addition to the literature.

 
SIGN IN
  User ID
 
  Password
 
 
  Forgot Password?   |   Register Now

 
Help Center
How to Prepare a Manuscript?
How to Submit a Revised Manuscript?
Article Processing Charges (APC)
Peer Review Policy
 
 
How to Submit a New Manuscript?
How Do I Become a Reviewer?
Open Access Policy
Publication Ethics Policy
 
 
         
 
Insight Knowledge © 2017